
A choice model based on utility in a sequence of prospective future health states permits us to generalize the concept of the value of statistical life (VSL). Our representative national survey asks individuals to choose between costly risk-reducing programs and the status quo in randomized stated choice scenarios. Our model allows for separate marginal utilities for discounted net income and avoided illness years, post-illness years, and lost life-years. Our estimates permit calculation of overall willingness to pay to reduce risks for a wide variety of different prospective illness profiles. These can be benchmarked against the standard VSL as a special case.
Links:
[1] http://luskin.ucla.edu/jr-deshazo
[2] http://luskin.ucla.edu/school-public-affairs/public-policy
[3] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069612000769
[4] http://luskin.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/demand for health risk reductions_0.pdf