Some Homeowners Are Going Without Insurance But Choosing to Stay Put Inaugural UCLA Luskin California Poll reveals residents’ financial well-being and views on voting age, A/C and bracing for wildfire

More than 1 in 5 California homeowners have dropped their home insurance because their policies were canceled or premiums have become unaffordable.

Yet despite a greater financial risk from wildfire and other threats, more than 9 in 10 of these uninsured households would rather stay in their communities than relocate.

This snapshot of the state’s high insurance burden is one of many findings from the inaugural UCLA Luskin California Poll, which measures residents’ viewpoints on some of the most pressing issues of our time.

Directed by UCLA Luskin scholar Martin Gilens, the 2025 poll also took the temperature of Californians on issues including household financial stability, efforts to lower the voting age, air conditioning access at home and in schools, and concerns about climate change.

“Policymakers need a clear understanding of the challenges Californians face,” said Gilens, a professor of public policy, political science and social welfare. “The UCLA Luskin California Poll supports more effective policymaking by systematically documenting Californians’ lived experiences with the urgent economic, environmental and political issues of our times.”

Here are some insights from the poll of 2,419 adults in the state, conducted in English and Spanish from March 5 to May 25, 2025:

  • Financial well-being: One section of the poll set out to identify residents’ economic vulnerabilities using metrics that are more expansive than mere income level. For example, 22% of respondents reported that, faced with an emergency, they would not be able to come up with $2,000 in 30 days. The poll also showed frequent use of financial services outside of mainstream banking, including payday loans (used by 31% of respondents), auto title loans (25%), and pawn shops (22%). Read the policy brief
  • Ballot access: With growing interest in lowering the voting age in the U.S. and internationally, the survey set out to understand the level of support among Californians from different regions and demographic groups. For national elections, about 60% opposed lowering the age to 16 or 17. For school board and local elections, respondents were more evenly split, with about 52% in opposition. Age was a strong determinant of public opinion, with people age 18 to 34 showing robust support while those 55 and older were strongly opposed. Read the policy brief
  • Access to air conditioning: With temperatures rising across the state, access to cooling relief from air conditioning is a public safety issue. While nearly 85% of respondents reported having access to air conditioning in at least part of their homes, almost half said they have at times chosen not to use it due to cost. For those with a child enrolled in a K–12 school, 56% indicated that they have kept their student home due to concerns that the indoor temperatures at school are too hot. Read the policy brief
  • Climate hazards: California has unusually high exposure to climate change hazards, which contribute directly and indirectly to economic losses, social dislocation, illnesses and injuries, and premature death. The poll found that respondents’ No. 1 climate-driven concern is wildfire, followed by heat and drought. Flooding and sea level rise were named by less than 10% of respondents. The poll also found mixed attitudes on whether preparing for different hazards is a matter of personal responsibility or government action. Read the policy brief
  • Homeowners insurance: The poll section on Californians’ ability to insure their homes highlighted rising costs over the past three years. Homeowners whose policies have been canceled or who cannot afford the expense of insurance are acutely vulnerable to future financial risks from environmental hazards. Read the policy brief

 

National Shade Map a Stroke of ‘Bruingenuity’

A new national Shade Map spearheaded by experts at the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation and the nonprofit American Forests made UCLA Magazine’s list of the top 25 “Bruinventions” of the 21st Century (so far).

The tool helps cities across the United States respond to extreme heat by mapping an essential climate solution: shade.

“Never before has it been this easy for communities in the U.S. to know how much shade they have, where it is and whether the source is buildings or vegetation,” said V. Kelly Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. The resource gives decision-makers in more than 360 cities and towns the data to guide local heat resilience efforts.

The top 25 Bruinventions, listed in the latest edition of UCLA Magazine, pays tribute to the long history of creativity and innovation by UCLA students, faculty and alumni. This century’s index of Bruingenuity includes scientific discoveries, technological wizardry, medical marvels, and ingenious gadgets.

Read the full story

Keeping California Children Cool: Strategies for Safe Schools and Homes

By Mara Elana Burstein

As heat waves become more frequent and intense, many California children face unsafe indoor temperatures where they spend most of their time — at home and at school. Access to cooling in homes and schools is now a public health necessity, not a luxury.

Building on years of research on heat resilience and school safety, the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation has released a report offering policymakers a menu of strategies to expand access to cooling in homes and schools. The recommendations focus on the installation and maintenance of air conditioning and other mechanical cooling systems, offering practical, evidence-based options for state leaders seeking to protect children where they live and learn.

Children shouldn’t have to choose between their health and their education. Our research shows that California can take immediate, concrete steps to make schools and homes safer from heat. — Lana Zimmerman, project manager and lead author of the report

The report outlines a set of policy and regulatory actions California leaders can adopt:

  • Set indoor temperature standards for schools and plan similar action during the 2031 Building Standards Code update, or sooner as an emergency health and safety measure.
  • Track cooling access in schools, as the state already does for homes.
  • Coordinate agencies through a state-level advisory committee.
  • Fund existing programs that support equitable access to indoor cooling by serving high-need schools, homes, and regions.
  • Centralize public information and simplify funding processes for local governments and communities.
  • Prioritize equity by investing in high-need regions and supporting workforce training for cooling system installation.

These strategies are informed by new data from the 2025 Luskin California Poll that reveal gaps in access to indoor cooling and public opinion on state action. In the survey, nearly half of parents said they’ve kept their kids home because of heat, and yet one in ten households with children lack working air conditioning (AC). Many more Californians avoid using their AC because of high energy bills.

“Expanding access to cooling is about more than comfort. It’s about health and equity,” said V. Kelly Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. “The solutions outlined in our report recognize that children in low-income households and communities of color are often the most exposed to heat and have the least resources to respond,” added Turner, who is also an associate professor of urban planning at UCLA Luskin.

As California implements new investments in school modernization, clean energy, and community resilience, this research offers a timely guide for aligning those efforts. The report, “Keeping Californians Safe with Cooling Systems in Homes and Schools,” underscores that keeping classrooms cool and homes safe is essential to a healthy, equitable future for the state’s children.

Helping America’s Schools Adapt to the Climate Era

As the number of extreme heat days stretches later into the fall, many of the nation’s schools are seeking ways to adapt, but they’re often hindered by aging infrastructure and cuts to federal funding for climate upgrades.

Installing air conditioning or adding shade canopies to vast expanses of asphalt are effective but may come with red tape and a high price tag, said V. Kelly Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation.

“A lot of our schools are older and probably in need of modernization,” Turner told Time magazine. “And climate change is casting some light on the fact that they really are underfunded to do that.”

Treating schools as community centers is one strategy that could be beneficial around the country, said Turner, an associate professor of urban planning at UCLA Luskin.

“If it’s really hot, some schools just send kids home, but what if a child is going home to a home that has no air conditioning? Now we’ve sent them to a place that’s maybe just as unsafe,” she said. “But if schools are seen as more like community centers and resource hubs, then we can provide all-day-long air conditioning to 25% of the population in one site in the community.”

Turner on the Power of Shade to Combat Urban Heat

UCLA Luskin urban planning professor Kelly Turner lends her expertise in urban planning and heat resilience to offer data-backed perspective on how shade — both leafy and architectural — is essential for public health. In a New York Times opinion piece, Turner challenges the conventional wisdom that shade makes public spaces less usable and desirable. She explains that shade can reduce outdoor heat burden as much as 30%, offering critical relief to vulnerable communities who bear the brunt of urban heat.

Turner most recently, in collaboration with American Forests, developed an innovative shade-mapping tool to identify where shade is most needed. These maps can guide transit planners to reroute bus stops to cooler corridors or encourage cities to add shade where it will have the most impact.

Though much of our current planning policy still prioritizes sunlight, Turner argues it’s time for a shift. As climate change accelerates, shadows shouldn’t be feared — they should be welcomed.

Turner on New Tool for Assessing Health Risks of Extreme Heat

Kelly Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation (LCI), commented in an LAist story on a new tool to help people understand health risks they face from extreme heat. The California Communities Extreme Heat Scoring System, or CalHeatScore, is a pilot program that ranks risk from extreme heat by ZIP code into four categories — mild to severe. A ranking of “severe,” say the tool’s developers, could correspond with a higher temperature inland, as opposed to at the beach. “There’s so many mediating factors between a person, a hot day, and whether or not that person becomes ill,” said Turner, who is involved in evaluating the implementation of the tool. CalHeatScore is still in early stages of product development, but, said Turner, “It’s a stepping stone to the future in which heat warnings aren’t about the actual temperature threshold.” She explained, “They’re highly personalized — because exposure to heat and whether or not you get sick depends on factors that are more personal than universal.”

 

Turner on Cooling Cities

V. Kelly Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation (LCI), was interviewed for a NBC 7 story about the cooling impact of special surface coatings that may reduce heat by reflecting light instead of absorbing it. The story is focused on a parking lot in San Diego’s Mission Bay coated with a product designed to reduce surrounding temperatures, or the “urban heat island” effect. “Surfaces like asphalt are really, really hot because they soak up a lot of the sun’s energy and slowly re-radiate it back throughout the day,” Turner said. She added that a lighter surface can quickly reflect more of the sun’s heat and, as part of a comprehensive cooling approach, may drop the overall temperature in an urban area by a couple of degrees. Lighter pavement is a start, but the best way cities and people can get cooler is by adding more trees to create shade, she said.

Turner on How Cities Can Help Shape Responses to Heat

A Smart Cities Dive brief on heat resilient cities cites V. Kelly Turner, associate professor of urban planning and associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation (LCI). The brief provides information from the federally funded Center for Heat Resilient Communities to cities interested in financial and technical assistance for extreme heat planning. Communities are eligible to apply by Jan. 24 for $10,000 and assistance to determine the impact of extreme heat on their area, assess their capacity to respond and design a “locally tailored blueprint for heat resilience,” according to the brief. Up to 10 cities will be selected. The center will “also be able to highlight how the experiences and local knowledge of diverse communities can help shape federal responses on heat,” said Turner, the center’s principal investigator. The Los Angeles-based Center for Heat Resilient Communities is one of two heat resilience research centers established by the Biden administration in May.


 

Schools and Heat: An Extreme Challenge

The Washington Post spoke to UCLA Luskin’s V. Kelly Turner about a new push to turn asphalt schoolyards into greener spaces that provide cooling relief at a time of rising temperatures. Turner has documented surface temperatures of 145 degrees Fahrenheit on playground asphalt, and alternatives such as rubber and artificial turf can get even hotter. “Schools are basically shade deserts,” said Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. Yet some districts have been slow to plant trees or install shade structures, citing funding, liability, maintenance and safety issues. “Everybody knows how to design a cool space: You put in more greenery, a ton of shade, you have lots of cross-ventilation. The problem is funding,” Turner said. “Are voters prepared to really pony up the money to make our schools safe for children in 20 or 30 years?” Turner also spoke to the Associated Press, CalMatters, Hechinger Report, LAist and The Atlantic about the impact of extreme heat on school campuses.


 

Establishing a Renter’s Right to Air Conditioning

A Smart Cities Dive article examining local policies that establish a renter’s right to cooling equipment cited two experts from the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation, Gregory Pierce and V. Kelly Turner. A number of cities are mandating cooling requirements, but in many cases tenants are still on the hook for their energy bills. Pierce recommended that cities and utilities work together to make cooling more affordable, particularly during hotter weather. Turner said any equity-oriented program must involve listening to community members about the tough choices they must make, and she encouraged local governments to act swiftly: “The question is, ‘Can we get something on the books to at least give people a fighting chance of having a safe thermal environment?” A separate article by The Good Men Project cited a Center for Innovation report that found that, in California, 29% of renters, compared to 20% of homeowners, do not have central or room air conditioners.