UCLA Grants Deepen Ties to the L.A. Community Projects by Luskin faculty will build collaboration among scholars, students and local partners

The first goal of UCLA’s Strategic Plan is deepening collaborations and connections with Los Angeles. This academic year, several UCLA Luskin faculty are helping the university meet that mark.

As recipients of grants from the UCLA Center for Community Engagement, these faculty will explore ways to strengthen ties between community partners and UCLA students and scholars, with the goal of finding solutions to L.A.’s most pressing issues.

This year, the UCLA Community-Engaged Research Grants will fund exploratory projects including:

Achieving and Implementing Abolition in Los Angeles

Co-Principal Investigators: David C. Turner III, assistant professor of social welfare, and Kelly Lytle Hernandez, professor of history, African American studies and urban planning

Community Partners: Justice LA; Check the Sheriff’s Coalition; Police-Free LAUSD Coalition; People’s Budget LA Coalition; PUSH LA Coalition; LA Youth Uprising Coalition

Million Dollar Hoods is a UCLA research project that advances the labors of activists and advocates working to change how public dollars are spent in Los Angeles. In particular, it advances the work of those seeking to reduce criminal justice budgets while expanding health services, housing options, welfare benefits and employment opportunities. This grant will fund a deep strategic planning and research process focused on implementing community-led policy initiatives that reallocate public resources to supporting human-centered services.

Aligning Housing Policy With Popular Demand for More Housing

Co-Principal Investigators: Zachary Steinert-Threlkeld, associate professor of public policy, and Paavo Monkkonen, professor of urban planning and public policy

Community Partner: Abundant Housing Los Angeles

Angelenos understand the scarcity of housing and want to see more constructed. According to a November 2020 survey by the Los Angeles Department of City Planning, 64% of Angelenos call increasing housing supply a top or high priority. Support for more housing is one of the few bipartisan policy issues in the country, yet new housing construction in Los Angeles remains at multi-decade lows and rents and housing prices continue to rise. Untangling this puzzle is the focus of this community research.

Building Urban Soil Networks in Los Angeles for Research and Action

Co-Principal Investigators: Kirsten Schwarz, associate professor of urban planning and environmental health sciences, and Jennifer Jay, professor of civil and environmental engineering

Community Partners: TreePeople; Physicians for Social Responsibility – LA; Communities for a Better Environment; Watts Labor Community Action Committee – Better Watts Initiative

Urban soils are an important regional and national equity concern that shape the health and well-being of urban dwellers. They also represent a paradox of sorts, as contaminated soils are a hazard and clean soils are beneficial to the ecosystem. This project brings together community groups active in urban soils work in the L.A. region to build relationships, identify potential collaborations, and begin the process of coalescing around a common set of research priorities and actions.

Building Worker Power: Support for Low-Wage Worker Leadership With the Los Angeles Worker Center Network

Co-Principal Investigators: Chris Zepeda-Millan, associate professor of public policy, Chicano/a and Central American studies and political science, and chair of UCLA’s Labor Studies program; and Tobias Higbie, professor of history and director of the UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment

Community Partners: Los Angeles Worker Center Network, including: CLEAN CarWash Worker Center; Garment Worker Center; Koreatown Immigrant Workers Alliance; Los Angeles Black Worker Center; Pilipino Workers Center; Restaurant Opportunities Center Los Angeles; Warehouse Workers Resource Center

The UCLA Labor Center, a founding member of the Los Angeles Worker Center Network, seeks to document best practices around multi-racial, multi-industry, multi-language organizing in support of labor standards, immigrant rights and anti-discrimination enforcement. In this project, researchers and worker centers will determine the best methods — such as popular education, storytelling, academic journals and social media — to document successful and replicable L.A. worker campaigns since 2009. They will also implement legal clinics and provide technical assistance to local agencies enforcing fair labor laws.

Healing Within While Incarcerated: The Role of Credible Messengers in Transformative Justice in L.A. County

Co-Principal Investigators: Lauren Ng, assistant professor of psychology, and Laura Abrams, professor of social welfare

Community Partner: Healing Dialogue and Action

Incarcerated youth experience a multitude of poor social, emotional and physical health outcomes after detention. To address these concerns, Los Angeles County has adopted a “rehabilitative, care-first model” of juvenile justice that is being implemented by Credible Messengers — leaders with the lived experience of incarceration. There has been limited academic collaboration investigating Credible Messenger programs. This partnership with an organization working in county juvenile justice facilities will advance the science behind the Credible Messenger approach with the aim of promoting healing of justice-involved youth.

Housing and Homelessness Justice Research Collaborative

Co-Principal Investigators: Chris Herring, assistant professor of sociology, and Ananya Roy, professor of urban planning, social welfare and geography

Community Partners: LA Tenants Union; Union de Vecinos

This grant supports a recently established collaborative partnership between UCLA faculty and the Downtown local of the LA Tenants Union. The funds will allow the partners to broaden a study of Los Angeles’ Permanent Supportive Housing initiative to address homelessness. Despite billions of dollars recently committed to this initiative, no research to date has examined its success or weaknesses. The UCLA grant will allow additional community partners to participate and aid the collaborative in envisioning a multi-year tenant justice research agenda.

Interdisciplinary Center on Housing and Homelessness

Co-Principal Investigators: Till von Wachter, professor of economics; Michael Lens, professor of urban planning and public policy; and Elizabeth Bromley, professor in residence of psychiatry and anthropology

Community Partners: Individual community members; Los Angeles Homelessness Services Authority; L.A. County Department of Health Services; L.A. County Department of Mental Health; L.A. County Department of Social Services

L.A.’s housing and homelessness crises are caused by a complex web of factors ranging from lack of housing production and zoning policies to structural racism in labor markets and justice systems. This project focuses on developing an interdisciplinary center that brings research communities together with people with lived experience of homelessness and policymakers from Los Angeles government and nonprofit agencies. The project emphasizes structural reforms needed to reduce homelessness and aims to inform the public debate by replacing misconceptions with data and research.

Previous awards from the UCLA Center for Community Engagement supported the development of two courses designed to immerse undergraduates in community-engaged research. The grants went to Associate Professor of Public Policy Meredith Phillips, who developed a course on data analysis for educational research, and Associate Professor of Social Welfare Lené Levy-Storms, who developed a course on human aging through an interdisciplinary lens.

Read about all of the 2024-25 Community-Engaged Research Exploratory Grants.

Rapid Research Provides Vital Context to Address L.A. Wildfires UCLA Luskin data informs recovery efforts and counters misinformation during times of crisis

By Stan Paul

During a natural disaster such as the recent devastating wildfires in Los Angeles, information is needed — in real time — to assess and predict what will be required to help and rebuild communities. That information can be vital to address practical problems, to answer questions and even to counter false narratives that were fanned and spread as fast as the flames that destroyed entire neighborhoods.

That’s where UCLA Luskin and its research centers come in. In addition to responding to media and becoming a go-to source for expertise from day one of the fires, researchers quickly collaborated with their campus colleagues and beyond to create rapid responses to address pressing issues in the moment.

Rapid Response and Luskin’s Legacy of Community-Based Research

UCLA Luskin has a long legacy of community research. Even before L.A.’s most recent disaster, the School’s researchers have worked to collect and analyze data on issues that impact neighborhoods, individuals and businesses, especially those on the margins.

For researchers in the UCLA Center for Neighborhood Knowledge (CNK) and the UCLA Latino Policy and Politics Institute (LPPI), information is needed to help communities they know well. For them, it’s personal.

Silvia González, LPPI’s director of research, said the concept of rapid research response really grew during the COVID-19 pandemic. The institute was very proactive in providing data for policymakers and community-based organizations working to prioritize equitable recovery in any type of disaster or crisis.

“We learned from COVID-19 that people of color are not well represented in data points that inform crisis response. … That is where our community gets left behind in terms of getting their needs met,” González said.

pine sprout on burned ground

Read more about the rapid research produced by UCLA Luskin scholars to understand the causes and impacts of Los Angeles’ catastrophic fires at luskin.ucla.edu/fire-research

These communities have needs that are different from the broader community, including a higher exposure to environmental hazards, language barriers, and disproportionate health, economic and social risks, she said. “And so that really was the motivation for responding with original research on the L.A. wildfires.”

A team, including Paul Ong, research professor and director of CNK; Chhandara Pech, the center’s deputy director; and other contributors from LPPI, the UCLA Asian American Studies Center and the UCLA Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies, produced a number of key research projects.

Among them was a data brief examining the impacts of wildfires on Black households in Altadena, a historically Black, middle-class and culturally vibrant community that was devastated by the January 2025 Eaton fire. The brief provides a starting point for considering what an equitable recovery should include, the researchers said.

It also provides new information on the historical trajectory of Altadena’s Black community and the impacts from the wildfires, using multiple data sources. Using existing trends in the Altadena housing market and Black settlement patterns, combined with damage and destruction created by the Eaton fire, the researchers were able to demonstrate the disproportionate impact of the fires on Black households in that community.

The report also underscores the urgent need for disaster response and long-term recovery efforts tailored to the unique needs of Altadena’s Black community, the researchers wrote.

“Altadena is a litmus test about how committed we are to racial justice,” Ong said in an interview with CBS Evening News in February.

This is also true of Latino communities. In another research project, Ong and his team note that wildfires in California are not just a seasonal concern, but have far-reaching effects that go beyond the burn zones.

Together with CNK, the LPPI research team plans to develop ongoing analyses that examine the short- and long-term consequences of the wildfires on Latino communities with a focus on health vulnerabilities, economic disruptions and gaps in preparedness.

“As researchers of color, the pandemic showed us the invisibility of our community in data … but it also helped train us to do this research now,” said Pech, adding that the team wants to ensure that elected officials have a clear and more nuanced understanding of the wildfires’ impacts across different racial and socioeconomic groups.

“One of the things we do know is that these events are very complex. They’re embedded in complex structures,” Ong added. “So, part of what we try to do is understand some of the hidden dimensions of this complexity. We try to understand the rippling effects, a sort of cascade, beyond the most immediate and obvious impacts.”

Wildfires, Water and Transportation

Rapid response from other areas of Luskin, as well as cross-campus partners, include expertise on water and climate from the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation (LCI). At the same time, experts from the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies and UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies quickly initiated research projects while providing media with context about how transportation planning plays a role in how communities and regions can plan for disaster.

Research projects include:

  • Understanding mobility challenges for vulnerable communities with limited vehicle access —Tierra Bills, UCLA assistant professor of public policy and civil and environmental engineering
  • Improving evacuation plans for transit riders Madeline Brozen, deputy director of the Lewis Center
  • Bridging gaps in evacuation and resilience strategies for older adults with disabilities — Yeonsu Song, UCLA assistant professor of nursing and medicine
  • Exploring community-driven approaches to infrastructure rebuilding Megan Mullin, faculty director of LCI
  • Strengthening street network resilience after disasters — John Gahbauer, UCLA ITS research consultant

“We’re supporting research that can help us to be prepared for a future emergency, and to plan for rebuilding in an equitable, resilient manner,” said UCLA ITS Director Adam Millard-Ball, emphasizing that the wildfire threat in Los Angeles is not going away.

In January 2025, Millard-Ball and a team of UCLA researchers published an article in the journal Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives that lays out a collaborative approach that puts people and equity at the center of transportation research. One section identifies auto dependency as a challenge for cities.

“Dependence on cars … leaves cities vulnerable to crises,” the researchers write. “For example, it leaves few options for evacuation in case of fuel shortages or road blockages, or for people who do not drive.” During the L.A. fires, that was a reality that could be seen in news coverage of abandoned and burned vehicles.

Media and Misinformation

From the beginning of the fires, Greg Pierce, LCI’s co-executive director and the director of UCLA’s Human Right to Water Solutions Lab, responded to media outlets looking for facts behind emerging narratives. False and misguided fire story frameworks spread out of control, so in addition to quickly responding to news outlets, Pierce and his team provided a Question and Answer resource for the media and public.

A common question was, “Can urban water supply systems put out wildfires?” The quick answer is no. “Urban water supply systems are not designed to fight large wildfires or large-scale fires that start in wildland areas and spread to urban areas,” according to the Q&A.

“I don’t know that any place in the world has a system like that,” said Pierce, who explained to media that such a system for fighting wildfires would be extremely expensive as well as come with potentially negative climate impacts that could create further fire risks.

Pierce became the de facto go-to expert for media outlets including POLITICONew York TimesWashington PostLos Angeles TimesAssociated PressReuters and LAist on the wildfires and related issues such as water.

The fires touched almost every aspect of living in Los Angeles, from cars, work and land use to housing and rent — and UCLA Luskin had researchers on hand to respond.

Liz Koslov, assistant professor of urban planning and an expert on climate retreat, told the New York Times, “Rather than dream we can retreat our way out of the crisis, we must relearn, and learn anew, how to live with fire.”

Michael Manville, chair and professor of Urban Planning, commented in the media, saying, ‘The upshot is that a lot of people who had been housed … have just been thrust into the housing market, and they’re going to push up prices and rents, and also compete for contractors in an already tight labor market to get things rebuilt.”

Environmental issues also intersected with health for those affected by smoke from the fires. According to a recent UCLA report, smoke produced by California wildfires kills more people than fire, with thousands of premature deaths attributable to exposure to toxic particles. Rachel Connolly, a project director at LCI, served as the lead author of the study published in the journal Science Advances.

Recovery and the Road Ahead

UCLA Luskin researchers are also partnering with local government for the long recovery ahead, leading research for a blue ribbon commission launched by Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath.

Horvath and UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk announced that UCLA will provide its world-class research expertise and programmatic support to the independent commission tasked with developing policy recommendations to guide a safe and resilient recovery.

Mullin, the LCI faculty director, is leading UCLA’s advisors in consultation with Julia Stein, deputy director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School of Law, and in partnership with Alex Hall, director of UCLA’s Sustainable LA Grand Challenge.

“Our region has always lived with fire, but our communities weren’t built for the climate-induced mega-fires we see now,” Mullin said during a press conference. “We have a short window of opportunity to not only rebuild homes and businesses but also to create more resilient and equitable communities.”

In addition, this year’s Luskin Summit quickly pivoted to focus on the L.A. fires. The summit will provide policymakers and nonprofit leaders with the latest research and guidance from UCLA Luskin experts, community groups and government agencies to guide the effort to expedite recovery equitably.

In the years ahead, the work of UCLA Luskin researchers will continue to be an important resource as Los Angeles and the region recover.

A First-Hand Look at How a Public Affairs Education Translates Into Real Action The second annual UCLA Luskin Sacramento Briefing immerses students into research that shapes policy

This year, UCLA Luskin hosted the 2nd Annual Sacramento Briefing, an event that informs state legislators of the breadth of research happening within the school. The gathering featured two panel discussions coordinated by esteemed UCLA Luskin faculty members and their affiliated research centers in collaboration with elected officials, government agencies and other policy experts. This year, the Institute of Transportation Studies presented on reducing vehicle miles traveled on California’s roads, and the Luskin Center for Innovation presented on creating heat-resilient communities. 

Ten public affairs undergraduate students and 14 master of urban planning students received scholarships to attend the briefing, and also meet with legislative staffers, receive a private tour of the Capitol building, and sit down with Assemblymembers Mike Fong and Josh Hoover, both UCLA alumni.

We asked Mai Vu, a public affairs major who will be graduating this June, to reflect on her experience as part of the first undergraduate cohort to attend the event. Next year, Mai will be working in-house in the private sector for a global consumer goods company, focusing on government and regulatory affairs.

***

By Mai Vu

The 2025 Luskin Sacramento Briefing was an eye-opening experience that brought policy to life in ways I hadn’t imagined. As part of the first cohort of Public Affairs undergraduate students to receive a travel grant for this two-day professional development event, I had the opportunity to step inside the heart of California’s state government and witness firsthand how decisions are made at the state level. More importantly, I was able to connect with UCLA alumni — now staffers, policymakers and legislative aides at the state Capitol — who had once been in my shoes and could share their experiences and career paths from Westwood to Sacramento in a way that felt especially relatable.

“As a student researcher, this experience challenged me to think about how I can ensure my own work is accessible, actionable and relevant beyond the academic setting,” says Luskin undergrad Mai Vu.

Engaging with State Governance

On our first day in Sacramento, we met with UCLA alumni at the Capitol who discussed their work in state policymaking. Sitting in the very spaces where decisions are made, I saw how the issues we study in Public Affairs — from infrastructure to education — translate into real governance. Touring the Assembly and Senate galleries reinforced this connection, as we engaged with elected officials, policy analysts and professionals in administrative and judicial roles, making me realize the many pathways into state government and broadening my perspective on career opportunities in Sacramento.

Like many of my peers at Luskin, I am drawn to public service by the desire to create meaningful change. My time in Sacramento showed me how state government can be a direct and impactful avenue for that work, particularly in my home state of California. Speaking with policymakers and legislative staff, I gained a clearer understanding of how California’s Legislature functions within the broader political landscape and how it differs from the intense partisanship that often defines U.S. politics.

While political divisions certainly exist, my discussions in Sacramento helped me realize that California’s legislative majority allows for a greater focus on policy implementation rather than ideological debate, leading to more effective governance. This became clear in our discussion with Assemblymember Josh Hoover, who explained how working in the Republican minority requires a strong focus on bipartisan collaboration. His approach to coalition-building challenged my assumptions about politics, reminding me that progress relies more on negotiation, adaptation and shared priorities than strict party alignment.

Equally inspiring was our meeting with Assemblymember Mike Fong and his chief of staff, Sophia Kwong Kim, who spoke about their roles in the California Asian & Pacific Islander (API) Legislative Caucus. As a Vietnamese American student interested in government, seeing leaders who not only shared my API background but were actively working to amplify API voices in policy and create pathways for diverse representation was incredibly meaningful.

Bridging Academia, Policy and Local Communities

The second day’s policy briefing challenged me to think more critically about how research translates into action. As an undergraduate student researcher, it was particularly meaningful to see UCLA faculty — many of whom have taught my classes — present their work in front of legislators and policy practitioners. It reinforced that academic research doesn’t exist in isolation; when framed effectively, it has real-world implications. One of the biggest lessons I learned was that there is real benefit in research, no matter how rigorous or theory-driven, being communicated in a way that policymakers and the public can engage with. As a student researcher, this experience challenged me to think about how I can ensure my own work is accessible, actionable and relevant beyond the academic setting.

Another key takeaway I had from the policy briefing was realizing the power of collaborating beyond just my immediate peers. Seeing faculty, policymakers and community stakeholders engage in discussions — not always agreeing, but always exchanging perspectives — was a reminder that policymaking is rarely black and white. It requires negotiation, compromise and an open acknowledgement of competing priorities.

As I prepare to graduate and begin my career in regulatory and government affairs for the private sector, this experience reaffirmed the importance of cross-sector collaboration. The briefing exposed me to a range of perspectives — from legislators to policy researchers and advocacy groups — mirroring the diverse stakeholder landscape I will navigate. Like policymakers balancing competing priorities, I will need to negotiate between corporate interests, regulatory requirements and public concerns. This experience also provided an early foundation in state government processes and expanded my UCLA network, making future opportunities in public policy, consulting or regulatory agencies more accessible.

 

A Resourceful Upbringing Inspires a Life of Service Early life lessons propel Luskin Public Affairs major Cecy Rivera to fight for her community

By Mary Braswell

As a sophomore in high school, Cecy Rivera set out to fix a problem she saw in her Orange County community.

Fellow students from low-income families like her own showed great promise, but they lacked the communication and leadership training needed to fulfill their potential. So Rivera secured a grant to co-found and co-teach a program to help bridge the skills gap.

That early success fueled Rivera’s activism and ambitions, and she has since won multiple honors, including a Bank of America Student Leaders award for civic-minded youth and an Obama Foundation scholarship for public service. At a ceremony at the United Nations, she was celebrated as a “Hispanic Star: Changemakers Shaping America.”

The UCLA Luskin Public Affairs major spent fall quarter in the intensely selective White House Internship Program, coming back to California just in time to cast her vote as the youngest member of the state’s 2024 Electoral College slate.

All of this by age 19.

“Public service is the one pathway that encompasses everything that I love and allows me to help people,” Rivera says.

Her earliest memories reveal a gift for creative problem-solving. Born in the United States, the daughter of farmworkers was raised in Mexico until age 7.

“What I learned during those years was how to make something where there is nothing,” she recalls.

“We would have art projects and classroom projects, and my family just didn’t have the money to buy the supplies,” so Rivera figured out how to make paintbrushes from string and pencils, and paint from whatever vegetables were in the house.

“All of those experiences taught me how to be scrappy, and I think that’s such a big asset now.”

Upon her return to the U.S., Rivera was a star student, eventually attending a dual enrollment high school on the campus of Santa Ana Community College that enabled her to graduate with a liberal arts associate’s degree.

Off campus, she sought out experiences that would satisfy her thirst for learning: an apprenticeship at the UC Irvine School of Law, an internship with U.S. Rep. Lou Correa — and a financial literacy course she took at age 15 where she realized many of her peers were at a distinct disadvantage.

“Part of that program was creating a ‘Shark Tank’-like pitch of a business venture. And when I looked around the room, I felt that the students from my low-income community, most of them first-generation, weren’t actively participating.

“That’s when it hit me. These students have never had a course on public speaking, on interviewing, resume prep, on how to communicate, how to negotiate with one another, all of that.”

She drew on the skill she had honed since childhood: identifying a challenge and brainstorming a solution.

With her friend Avery Ngo, Rivera launched Competitive Edge, a program that would teach critical thinking, assertiveness, team-building, email etiquette and other professional skills to more than 700 disadvantaged students.

The venture, which debuted when Rivera was in 12th grade, was made possible with seed funding and mentorship from the Dragon Kim Foundation, an Orange County nonprofit supporting youth empowerment and entrepreneurship.

“At that point in my life, I had gone through so many supportive programs … and had the opportunity to experience how other people behave, the way they carry themselves, their demeanor,” Rivera said. “And so I knew that I had to give that back to the students, to show them an example of what else was out there.

“And by building this organization, I was able to find out the things that I was good at, like making community partnerships and reaching out to people and creating a curriculum. I loved it.”

After this first entrepreneurial experience, doors of opportunity opened, one after the other. Rivera’s internship with Congressman Correa led him to support her participation as a California elector. And the coveted White House internship brought a series of “wow moments,” including watching Marine One lift off and meeting the vice president, first lady and Cabinet officials.

“As a little Mexican girl who could never even dream of anything like this, it was incredible,” she says.

Now at UCLA, she’s on track to complete her Public Affairs major and Education minor in three years, with plans to graduate in 2026. She aspires to develop new school designs and curricula that broaden opportunities for all students, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

This summer, Rivera will travel abroad to study innovative educational models and bring their lessons back home. The trip will be funded through her Obama-Chesky Voyager Scholarship, a two-year program to shape the next generation of leaders.

“One thing that we can do right now is tailor our curriculum to be more individualized, to bank on the unique interests and talents of each student, to get them to explore and expand their horizons,” she says.

“Why not make school, the one place where students spend so much of their time, the place where they grow the most?”

 

 

‘It Is Only Possible to Fail If We Forget’ Exhibit captures impact of the Echo Park Lake tent community, with lessons for future social movements

“Tents and Tenants: After Echo Park Lake,” a public exhibition organized by the UCLA Luskin Institute on Inequality and Democracy (II&D), captures the spirit of community and resistance that emerged in a settlement of tents in an iconic public park in the gentrified heart of Los Angeles.

The exhibition is part of an effort to preserve an important chapter in social movement history, when housed and unhoused organizers fought to protect the alternative world they created at the Echo Park Lake encampment, which was ultimately dismantled by police in March 2021, amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Presented with support from the Mellon Foundation, the exhibition is open to the public until March 30, 2025, at the Skid Row History Museum & Archive, a project of the Los Angeles Poverty Department.

This essay, “It Is Only Possible to Fail If We Forget” by II&D researcher Annie Powers, a PhD candidate in history at UCLA, originally appeared in the Skid Row Arts Zine and is reprinted with permission.

If, as Cuban militant Che Guevara put it, “the true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love,” then the After Echo Park Lake Archive is a love letter to the future.

Convened by the UCLA Luskin Institute on Inequality and Democracy, the After Echo Park Lake Archive began with a collective of housed and unhoused scholar-organizers who participated in the encampment uprising — myself included. Organizing through, and bearing witness to, the afterlives of the Echo Park Lake eviction, the collective’s members experienced the ways in which the encampment was remembered — and, crucially, misremembered.

There were flashy news stories depicting the infrastructure built by encampment residents, the support of the homeless community by the housed community, and the mass eviction by militarized riot police. Marches, rallies, direct actions and eviction defenses at Echo Park Lake all made their way into print — itself an achievement. But beneath and preceding these public accounts, we knew, was the much longer, quieter work required to build the power to fight and the power to stay.

What about the months of weekly strategy meetings and outreach walks? Discussions during pick-up basketball games? Planning schematics for building the showers? Neither spontaneously formed nor perfect by any stretch of the imagination, the organizing between housed and unhoused tenants at Echo Park Lake offers key lessons, ideas and histories to homeless people’s movements of the present and future.

This became the principle of the archive: collecting records of the Echo Park Lake experience that might help housed and unhoused organizers of the future take up the fight in their own times and places. Specifically, this meant prioritizing materials not otherwise publicly available — those produced by encampment members and organizers themselves in the process of collective struggle.

Crucially, we include memories in this collection process, and so the archive contains oral histories with key participants in the Echo Park Lake encampment uprising. We opted to collect materials that would otherwise disappear, materials that tell stories not heard in the press, materials that offer a blueprint for the struggle at Echo Park Lake — not to copy-paste into new contexts, but so that organizers of the future can understand the conditions in which we operated and the paths we chose to take. We also make clear that the eviction from Echo Park Lake was not the end of the story: The people involved kept fighting back.

For members of the After Echo Park Lake Archive Collective, the archive attempts to historicize the future. When we began to organize, there were few examples to which we could look. We now understand that this is not because homeless people did not organize in the past, but because there is no historical consciousness of such movements in the United States.

The After Echo Park Lake Archive attempts to cut against such forgetting. We hope to pass on these lessons of love and life — and conflict, confusion and repression, too — to our descendants in struggle. Together, unhoused and housed people, organizing in solidarity, cracked open a window into a different world — one whose undergirding logic was not banishment but loving solidarity. Despite the mass eviction and the death and suffering it yielded, the archive suggests that we must not see Echo Park Lake as a failure — but part of a long arc of organized homeless people’s struggle in Los Angeles, the United States and the world.

It is only possible to fail if we forget.

Photos from “Tents and Tenants” Opening Night

View more photos and video from opening night.

Skid Row History Museum & Archive
250 South Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Open Thursday, Friday and Saturday, 2 – 5 p.m.

“Tents and Tenants” public programs
Friday, Feb. 21, at 7 p.m. – Tenants in the Streets, A Panel Discussion
Friday, March 21, at 7 p.m. – The Liberatory Living Room, A Performance

UCLA Partners With New Independent Commission for Climate-Resilient Fire Recovery Experts will provide L.A. civic leaders with research-informed policy options for building safer, more resilient communities

By Jason Islas

Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath and UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk announced that UCLA will provide its world-class research expertise and programmatic support to an independent commission tasked with developing policy recommendations to guide a safe and resilient recovery for Los Angeles in the wake of the 2025 wildfires.

“The commission we are announcing is a terrific example of our university and its partners in the region working together,” Frenk said at a Feb. 13 news conference. “UCLA is not just a university in Los Angeles. It is a university of Los Angeles. Today’s blue-ribbon commission answers that call to action, and we are pleased to partner with Supervisor Horvath on this important initiative.”

“Los Angeles County cannot afford to simply rebuild what was lost — we must build for the future,” Horvath said. “This is our opportunity to rethink how we design communities, fortify infrastructure, and protect lives from the growing threats of the climate crisis. The blue-ribbon commission will ensure that we lead the way in creating fire-safe, climate-resilient communities that will stand for generations. Our communities are invited into this process led by Los Angeles’ leading experts across academia, urban design and sustainability, environmental justice, housing and finance.”

UCLA’s advisors will be led by Megan Mullin, faculty director of the Luskin Center for Innovation, in consultation with Julia Stein, deputy director for the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School of Law, and in partnership with Alex Hall, director of the Sustainable LA Grand Challenge. They will marshal UCLA’s expertise to bring objective, research-informed insights and innovative options to a commission of more than a dozen respected civic leaders, chaired by Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator CEO Matt Peterson, to inform their policy recommendations for L.A.’s future.

“Our region has always lived with fire, but our communities weren’t built for the climate-induced mega-fires we see now,” Mullin said. “We have a short window of opportunity to not only rebuild homes and businesses but also to create more resilient and equitable communities.”

The commission will develop recommendations focused on:

  • Fire-safe reconstruction: Implementing fire-resistant materials, defensible space strategies and climate-smart building standards.
  • Resilient infrastructure: Undergrounding utilities, expanding water storage and conveyance, and hardening power grids.
  • Faster rebuilding: Identifying resilient home designs and systems that could be pre-approved to expedite reconstruction, and offering financial incentives to support rebuilding.
  • Equitable recovery: Reducing the risk of displacement, ensuring affordable insurance and prioritizing support for vulnerable communities.

“An uncoordinated race to rebuild will amplify inequality and leave people at risk of future fires. This commission seeks to change that with thoughtful, data-driven policy solutions to build resilient communities for the future we’re facing,” Mullin said.

Hall, who launched the Climate and Wildfire Research Initiative through the Sustainable LA Grand Challenge to develop knowledge, tools and new modes of thinking to confront Southern California’s rapidly evolving wildfire challenge, said, “Los Angeles is at a turning point. This commission is a generational opportunity for UCLA to provide L.A. civic leaders with the expert knowledge — drawn from years of rigorous research — they need to create the policies that will shape the region for decades to come.”

“The world is watching to see how L.A. comes back from these devastating fires; it is hard to overstate the historic importance of this moment — and the role our university will play,” Hall said.

Participating UCLA faculty include:

  • Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment: Mary Nichols
  • Luskin School of Public Affairs: Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Evelyn Blumenberg, Greg Pierce, Mike Lens, Paul Ong, Minjee Kim, Liz Koslov
  • School of Architecture and Urban Design: Dana Cuff, Stephanie Landregan
  • Ziman Center for Real Estate: Stuart Gabriel
  • Institute of the Environment and Sustainability: Stephanie Pincetl, Aradhna Tripati
  • UCLA Labor Center: Saba Waheed
  • Fielding School of Public Health: Wendy Slusser

A portion of this effort is supported by a grant from the California Community Foundation and in-kind support from UCLA.

In Memoriam: Donald Shoup, Renowned UCLA Urban Planner and Parking Reform Pioneer Legendary Luskin professor, parking 'guru' and global figure in transportation and land use planning sparked a dedicated following of enthusiasts known as 'Shoupistas'

By Stan Paul

Donald Shoup, distinguished professor emeritus of urban planning, whose decades of teaching and scholarship at UCLA greatly influenced the field of land-use planning as well as generations of scholars, students and urban planners, died following a short illness on February 6, 2025, in Los Angeles. He was 86.

Shoup, a titan in the field of urban planning and specifically parking reform, is renowned for his pathbreaking research into how cities manage, or mismanage, parking spaces. This work, which demonstrated that seemingly mundane provisions in zoning codes had rendered many places overly dependent on driving, brought him academic accolades and made him an unlikely hero for a generation of urbanists determined to repair American cities. 

Among planners, government officials and activists, he became known as “UCLA’s parking guru,” a “parking rock star” and the “Shoup Dogg.” A Facebook group, thousands strong, sprung up organically to help spread his message. He even found his way into pop culture, as the subject of a YouTube animated feature on the television show “Adam Ruins Everything.”

Shoup was born in Long Beach in 1938 and earned his PhD in economics in 1968 at Yale University, where he also received master’s and bachelor’s degrees in economics and a BE in electrical engineering. He came to UCLA’s Institute of Government and Public Affairs in 1968 as a postdoctoral scholar and research economist — the same year as Harvey S. Perloff, the founding dean of the School of Architecture and Urban Planning

Donald Shoup’s social media bios described him as “Professor of Urban Planning at UCLA. Saving the world one parking space at a time.” Photo by Les Dunseith

Following his two-year appointment, Shoup taught at the University of Michigan but returned to UCLA in 1974 as an associate professor of urban planning, becoming a full professor in 1980. 

During his time at UCLA, he chaired the Department of Urban Planning, directed the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, and also held appointments and visiting and honorary scholar posts at several academic institutions, including Cambridge University, the University of Hawaii, the University of Buffalo, and the Beijing Transportation Research Center.  In 1993, he was invited to the White House in recognition of his research on employer-paid parking. From 2009-2017, he served as editor of the University of California’s ACCESS magazine. He retired from UCLA in 2015 as a distinguished professor.

Over the course of his career, Shoup won numerous awards. He was a fellow of the American Institute of Certified Planners, a select group of professional planners nominated by their peers in recognition of their “significant and transformational improvements to the field of planning and the communities they served.” In 2017, he received the Distinguished Educator Award from the Associated Collegiate Schools of Planning. The award, presented biennially, is the highest honor bestowed by the organization in appreciation of significant contributions that have made a difference to planning scholarship, education and practice. 

In 2021, he received the Dickson Emeritus Professorship Award honoring outstanding research, scholarly work, teaching and/or educational service performed at UCLA by an emeritus or emerita professor since retirement. 

Much of this prestige flowed from Shoup’s landmark book, “The High Cost of Free Parking,” which was first published in 2005. The book was the culmination of decades of his work and research on parking reform and parking as the link between land use and transportation.

Revised in 2011, “The High Cost of Free Parking”  has been translated into multiple languages, including Chinese, Russian, Romanian and Persian, and recorded as an audiobook. The book argues that cities make two crucial mistakes regarding parking. First, they fail to price the parking on their streets, and as a result curb spaces fill up and become hard to find. Second, to solve the problem they have created on the street, cities force into existence, through their zoning codes, excessive amounts of parking off street. In combination, these two errors compound each other. They lead cities to quietly subsidize cars, increase traffic congestion, worsen air pollution, encourage sprawl, degrade urban design, damage the economy, raise housing costs, reduce walkability, accelerate global warming, and make urban life more difficult for people who do not drive. 

Shoup’s proposed solution was to reverse these mistakes: start pricing the parking on-street, and stop requiring it off-street. The book became a classic in urban planning circles. Shoup wrote with wry wit and charm, and chose clarity over academic jargon, making it accessible. As a result, Shoup’s reform ideas gained steady acceptance in cities worldwide. The Parking Reform Network, a national nonprofit founded to advance Shoup’s ideas, has documented over 3,000 cities that have adopted some of his suggested reforms.  

In 2018, the American Planning Association included the publication of “The High Cost of Free Parking” in its timeline of key events in American city planning since 1900. Other books in this timeline included Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” and Jane Jacobs’ “Death and Life of Great American Cities.” A follow-up book that he edited, “Parking and the City” also became a vital resource for reformers; the planning website Planetizen included it in its list of top-10 books published in 2018.

Despite his retirement, Shoup was still a very active member of the UCLA Luskin community. He could often be seen in the corridors of the Luskin building or at the ITS offices. He was also scheduled to teach his famous parking class in the spring 2025 quarter.

He is survived by his wife Pat Shoup, brother Frank Shoup, his niece Allison Shoup, nephew Elliot Shoup, Elliot’s wife Megan and their three children.

Read more about Donald Shoup’s vast accomplishments and share your memories at this Tribute Page.

Tribute gifts in Don’s memory can be made to the Donald and Pat Shoup Endowed Fellowship Fund in Urban Planning at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, which will support fellowships for graduate students focusing on transportation studies. Gifts can also be made by check payable to the UCLA Foundation. Please include “Fund #82172E” in the memo field and mail to: The UCLA Foundation; PO Box 7145; Pasadena, CA 91109-9903

Mapping a Just Way Forward for L.A. As Los Angeles grapples with the impact of catastrophic fires, experts in public affairs provide context and insight

Experts from the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs are providing context and insight to news outlets covering Los Angeles’ catastrophic wildfires and the road to recovery. Here is a selection of their comments:

  • Liz Koslov, assistant professor of urban planning, on the need for humane and reasonable policies for recovery after the fires: “Rather than dream we can retreat our way out of the crisis, we must relearn, and learn anew, how to live with fire.” — New York Times     |     More from Koslov:  Bloomberg, Irish Times, The City
  • Megan Mullin, professor of public policy and faculty director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation, on the importance of setting community-driven priorities for post-fire recovery: “Without forethought and without coordination, we’re going to risk a rebuild that amplifies the region’s inequality.” — Marketplace     |     More from Mullin:  Vox
  • Paul Ong, director of the UCLA Center for Neighborhood Knowledge, on the challenges of recovery in diverse neighborhoods: “Altadena is a litmus test about how committed we are to racial justice.” —  CBS Evening News      |     More from Pierce:  Los Angeles Times
  • Veronica Terriquez, professor of urban planning and director of the UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center, on the loss of Chicano historian Juan Gómez-Quiñones’s archives in the Palisades fire: “The loss of his papers, the loss of other people’s archives. … We’re losing something really precious.” — Los Angeles Times
  • Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, interim dean of the Luskin School and distinguished professor of urban planning, on the inequalities arising from Southern California car culture, including wildfire risks heightened by climate change: Smog-producing cars became so central to life in the region because of “transportation policy that has quite favored the automobile and given a tremendous amount of investment to build the freeways.” — The Atlantic
  • Michael Manville, chair of UCLA Luskin Urban Planning, on the fires’ stressors on the Southern California housing market: “The upshot is that a lot of people who had been housed — who do have, for the most part, strong incomes — have just been thrust into the housing market, and they’re going to push up prices and rents, and also compete for contractors in an already tight labor market to get things rebuilt.”  — Commercial Observer    |    More from Manville:  Reason, New York Times
  • Chhandara Pech, deputy director of the UCLA Center for Neighborhood Knowledge, on research showing that language barriers prevented some Asian American residents from easily accessing emergency information during the fires: “Government agencies should not only focus on reaching the largest population that’s affected by the wildfires, but it should also prioritize supporting the most vulnerable and hard-to-reach communities.” — Los Angeles Times
  • Paavo Monkkonen, professor of urban planning and public policy, on streamlining the bureaucracy of home-building, a reform long-sought by affordable housing advocates and now coming to pass only in fire-affected areas: “Now suddenly we’re going to get it — but just for this.”  — New York Times     |    More from Monkkonen:   Libération
  • Michael Lens, professor of urban planning and public policy, on L.A.’s elevated housing prices: “Folks who haven’t had to really think about where they’re going to live next — who may have been living in, fortunately, stable housing situations for the last couple decades — are going to see a lot of sticker shock.” — LAist    |     More from Lens:  Los Angeles Times, Fortune
  • José Loya, assistant professor of urban planning, on the likelihood that more affordable housing options can be found farther from the fire zones: “L.A. is still a very, very large place.” — Los Angeles Times, Washington Post
  • Stephen Commins, associate director of Global Public Affairs at UCLA Luskin, on the challenge of cleaning up homes and neighborhoods: “Every home has potential hazards — from older homes with asbestos to any home that contained paint cans, lithium batteries and other standard but toxic when incinerated household items.” — UCLA Newsroom
  • Zev Yaroslavsky, veteran public servant and director of the Los Angeles Initiative at UCLA Luskin, on the city’s preparations for the 2028 Olympics and Paralympics: “What we cannot allow to happen is for the Olympics to take away the government’s attention from the most important thing, which is to rebuild after the fire.” — New York Times      |     More from Yaroslavsky:  L.A. Times Today, New York Times
  • Adam Millard-Ball, director of the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, on disconnected streets and disaster preparedness: “We’re seeing that the least-connected streets are in places that have historically been affected by fire. We know that the places that have burned in the past are also likely to burn in the future, and that’s true even in urbanized areas as well.” — Bloomberg     |     More from Millard-Ball:  Streetsblog, Next City
  • Minjee Kim, assistant professor of urban planning, on political rhetoric surrounding government requirements for rebuilding damaged or destroyed homes: “For any rebuilding that needs to happen, there shouldn’t be any additional ‘development permit’ that needs to be secured.” — Politico

 

UCLA ITS Funds Research on Vulnerable Communities, L.A. Fire Response Five projects will explore transportation challenges and community engagement in disaster recovery

California has long battled wildfires, but the scale and impact of recent fires have pushed emergency response systems to their limits. The fires that broke out in Los Angeles County in January presented new challenges as flames reached deeper into urban areas.

As recovery efforts begin, the fires have highlighted critical gaps in our region’s emergency response and transportation systems, especially for vulnerable communities. To assess and understand these challenges, the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies is funding five rapid-response research projects, with results expected within one to three months:

  • Understanding mobility challenges for vulnerable communities with limited vehicle access — Tierra Bills, UCLA assistant professor of public policy and civil and environmental engineering
  • Improving evacuation plans for transit riders — Madeline Brozen, deputy director of the UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
  • Bridging gaps in evacuation and resilience strategies for older adults with disabilities — Yeonsu Song, UCLA assistant professor of nursing and medicine
  • Exploring community-driven approaches to infrastructure rebuilding — Megan Mullin, faculty director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation
  • Strengthening street network resilience after disasters — John Gahbauer, UCLA ITS research consultant

The studies aim to support policymakers, transit agencies, emergency planners and local communities in shaping a more equitable and resilient approach to disaster response in the Los Angeles region.

UCLA ITS Director Adam Millard-Ball noted that the wildfire threat in Los Angeles is not going away. “We’re supporting research that can help us to be prepared for a future emergency, and to plan for rebuilding in an equitable, resilient manner,” Millard-Ball said.

Read full descriptions of the projects on the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies site

View more fire-related research from the Luskin School


 

Former Greek Prime Minister Cites Roles of Innovation and Imagination in Democracy George Papandreou's UCLA visit includes a briefing on wildfire management with Luskin scholars

By Sean Brenner

Drawing vivid comparisons and contrasts between democracy’s standing in the world today and its origins in ancient Greece, George Papandreou outlined a vision for preserving and protecting citizens’ role in governance amid a global rise in authoritarianism.

Papandreou, who served as Greece’s prime minister from 2009 to 2011, spoke Jan. 22 at the UCLA Luskin Conference Center. He proposed the need for a “new democratic social contract.”

“If democracy is under siege, we must not merely defend it; we must reimagine it,” he said. “The challenges of climate change, inequality and technology demand innovation in governance.”

Papandreou, whose father, Andreas, and grandfather, Georgios, both also served as prime minister of Greece, enumerated a series of measures he said could help strengthen democracy. Among them: banning unlimited corporate donations to lobbyists, restoring democratic education in public service media, introducing wealth taxes on billionaires and requiring full transparency in political advertising.

“These are some ideas,” Papandreou said. “But politics in the way the ancients taught it was not what we have today, with polling, tweeting, soundbites and looking for donors. It was actually to expand their imagination of a better future. The ancient Greeks said, ‘We don’t need tyrants to tell us what to do. We don’t need monarchs or kings or high priests. We can decide our future. Therefore, we can imagine a better future.’

“So politics, which means being a good citizen, means that we can collectively think of a better future. … Let’s open our imagination. Let’s be open to new ideas.”

woman with dark hair and glasses at podium

UCLA Luskin’s Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris cites George Papandreou’s support for “progressive democratic policies within and beyond the boundary of Greece.” Photo by Vince Bucci Photography

Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, interim dean of the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, introduced Papandreou, citing his passion for progressive democratic policies, deep commitment to global cooperation, and belief that governments are responsible for protecting the environment.

During his UCLA visit, Papandreou held a separate meeting on the urgent issue of wildfire management with Loukaitou-Sideris; Liz Koslov, an assistant professor of urban planning who specializes in climate justice; and Nicole Lambrou, who received her PhD in urban planning at UCLA Luskin and is now an assistant professor at Cal Poly Pomona.

At his public talk, Papandreou expressed sympathy for Angelenos who have been affected by the wildfires.

“I stand here before you with a heavy heart, as in recent days you have witnessed the horror of entire neighborhoods reduced to ash, lives uprooted, dreams turned to smoke,” he said, relating the experience to his having witnessed severe fires and floods destroy homes and natural habitats in Greece. “No words can truly capture the anguish of watching the place you call home disappear in flames.”

The talk was organized by the UCLA Stavros Niarchos Foundation Center for the Study of Hellenic Culture, and sponsored in part by the UCLA College Division of Humanities and Division of Social Sciences, and the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs.

In her opening remarks, Sharon Gerstel, director of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Center, highlighted its role as a nexus for intellectual and cultural programming based in a city that boasts a large and dynamic population of Greeks and Greek Americans.

Gerstel presented Papandreou with Greek and English versions of “Weaving Dreams: Kilims from Geraki, Laconia,” a book she co-edited that examines the history of textile art in the Greek village of Geraki.

Among the dignitaries in attendance were Christina Valassopolou, consul general of Greece in Los Angeles, and Andreas Kyprianides, honorary consul general of Cyprus in Los Angeles.

Watch the full lecture on the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Center’s YouTube channel