Golden Bachelder and Prokriti Monolina: Fellows on the First Budget and Finance Advisory Committee

by Jiah Lee

The L.A. City Council’s Budget and Finance Advisory Committee met for the first time this November with the goal of tackling structural financial issues and shifting towards more long-term budget planning by introducing outside expertise. The creation of this committee was proposed by Los Angeles City Council member Katy Yaroslavsky, who now serves as its chair.

Two UCLA graduate students, Golden Bachelder and Prokriti Monolina, are currently serving as fellows on this committee. Bachelder is a second-year Master of Public Policy (MPP) student and Monolina is a second-year Master of Urban and Regional Planning (MURP) student at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. Bachelder and Monolina are both fellows in the Office of Councilwoman Yaroslavsky. 

“It is an honor being able to help with the Budget and Finance Advisory Committee,” said Bachelder. “As one of the graduate student fellows, I am able to work with inspiring Los Angeles leaders and public servants in the effort to put Los Angeles in the best possible fiscal footing. I’m grateful for the opportunity to be able to help a cause that could benefit the city and its people for years to come.”

Monolina also shared her experiences with the committee. “As a UCLA Luskin Leadership Fellow, I am committed to supporting the Budget and Finance Advisory Committee (BFAC) in reimagining Los Angeles’s resources through rigorous policy analysis and targeted research in municipal finance and resource allocation. This work also involves in-depth research in real estate development, land use strategy, and the development of sound financial policy frameworks. It’s an incredible opportunity to work alongside experts and learn from them. One day, I hope to bring these insights to Bangladesh, my motherland,” she said.

Outside of the committee, Bachelder and Monolina continue to make a positive impact on policy reform and the future of their communities. Bachelder served as a fellow in the Office of California Governor Gavin Newsom where he worked to promote shared goals through research on initiatives, and Monolina is a waste researcher who founded an app called Eco360 that promotes green consumerism.

Only Los Angeles could spend $1.5 billion to make airport traffic worse

by Jacob Wasserman

When millions of people come to Los Angeles for the World Cup, Olympics and Paralympics, their first taste of the city will probably be the infuriating congestion of LAX. Now, do we want to treat our guests — and ultimately ourselves — to an even worse welcome: a half-finished, $1.5-billion roadway project at LAX that will only end up making traffic more gridlocked?

Whether you are crawling along in holiday traffic — achingly close to the terminal just hoping you’ll make the flight — or are making your daily commute to work at the airport and the many businesses that surround it, the approach roads to LAX are already one of Angelenos’ least favorite places. Now, LAX’s board has approved what they call a “modernization” project to reroute and expand the roads leading into the airport’s infamous “horseshoe.” This project isn’t scheduled to be completed before the 2028 Olympics. And what’s more, it won’t fix traffic at the airport — it will only make it worse.

Why? For one, any short-term travel-time improvements won’t last. Most drivers use Google Maps and Waze to algorithmically navigate shifts in traffic when heading to the airport. So even if a new ramp is temporarily faster, it will soon fill up again as traffic is directed there and as drivers gain familiarity with the routing. The idea that new lanes quickly become congested again as they draw in drivers from other routes, times of day and modes of travel is what planners call “induced demand.” This same thing happened in 2014, when authorities widened the 405: traffic got worse within just nine months as people shifted their travel onto the new lanes.

Moreover, there is still only so much curb and road space along the LAX horseshoe. Imagine using a wider funnel to fill the same bottle. That’s what will happen with these new roadways: pushing more cars into the same bottleneck.

The project’s own estimates forecast almost 41,000 new miles of vehicle travel each day once complete. And its environmental review concludes that the new traffic and emissions are a “significant and unavoidable impact” with “no feasible mitigation measures.”

Spare a thought here for residents of Westchester, Inglewood and El Segundo. They already live with cut-through traffic and the dangerous crashes and pollution this traffic causes. This project threatens to make all of that worse, risking lives and livelihoods for not just the immediate neighborhoods but the nearly 1 million people living within seven miles of LAX. It’s no wonder residents continue to organize against the plan.

The project was originally part of a larger, long-discussed expansion of the airport, formally announced in 2019 with the initial aim of adding two new terminals in time for the Olympics. But with passenger counts still down after the COVID-19 pandemic, LAX authorities scuttled the terminal expansions. And yet, the roadway plan marches on, despite having less traffic demand than before and no new terminals to serve. With much of its justification dead, it has become a “zombie project.”

This is all the more disappointing after LAX has done so much to open the airport to options other than private cars. Despite continued delays in its opening, the Automated People Mover promises to connect the terminals to each other, to rental car facilities and to drop-off points outside the horseshoe. Metro recently opened the beautiful LAX/Metro Transit Center, a rail station and bus hub at 96th Street and Aviation Boulevard at the end of the coming People Mover, finally allowing people to take transit between LAX and Metro’s growing network.

Inside the horseshoe, LAX reserved the lower inner lane for buses and moved economy ride-hail pickups to the consolidated LAX-it area. Soon, you’ll be able to take a train, bus, Lyft or Uber — or be dropped off by a friend — and zoom past traffic to your terminal on the People Mover.

Yet LAX authorities still plan to throw bad money after good. The roadway project proposes to build concrete walls and supports around the airport, making it all the more difficult for anything but a car to enter LAX.

Instead of a counterproductive roadway scheme, the airport should double-down on their multimodal successes. With expanded FlyAway service, you could take a frequent, comfortable bus from locations across the region and speed along transit-only lanes into LAX. With a safe and direct network of paths, you could walk or bike to your job at LAX, instead of navigating through a spaghetti bowl of roadway ramps. And with proper regulations and curb management, you could even take a shared autonomous vehicle to your terminal.

Decades of research and experience prove that adding more lanes doesn’t fix traffic. Though the People Mover will offer an alternative to traffic in the horseshoe, the only way to end it is congestion pricing. A dynamic toll — set just high enough to keep cars free-flowing and with provisions for disability access — could finally ease gridlock at LAX. Plus, it could earn money for the city’s beleaguered budget, offsetting its billions in costs. The transponder infrastructure to collect tolls is already in place today. With the free-to-use People Mover soon to open, now is the time to consider pricing the existing roads at LAX — not tearing them up and fruitlessly enlarging them right as the world comes to our doorstep.

The “LAX-pressway” is the last thing our airport needs. With the LAX board’s approval, only intervention from officials like Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Traci Park now can pump the brakes on this project.

This op-ed was originally published by Los Angeles Times. Jacob Wasserman is a research project manager at the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies and a planning commissioner in the City of Santa Monica.

Taylor on Why Traffic Is Getting Worse

UCLA Luskin’s Brian Taylor spoke to LAist’s AirTalk about traffic congestion that in some places has equaled or surpassed pre-pandemic levels.

Personal travel has waned, but delivery trucks and other commercial transportation have increased. And hybrid work schedules have added unpredictability to rush-hour traffic patterns.

Taylor shared the counterintuitive fact that Angelenos actually drive fewer vehicle miles per capita than most motorists in the nation’s 70 largest urbanized areas.

Southern California has a moderate level of density over a very big area, he explained. While the region is much denser than areas such as Memphis, Dallas or Kansas City, it is not dense enough to be walkable and transit-focused like San Francisco, New York and Boston.

“We actually have modest levels of driving but a very large number of people on a relatively limited road system, and that results in high levels of congestion,” said Taylor, a professor of urban planning and public policy.

In a megalopolis as enormous as the LA region, “there’s traffic because there’s 18 and a half million people who are trying to move around along with lots of goods.”

UCLA Luskin Faculty Win Grants to Internationalize Curriculum

Two UCLA Luskin faculty members are among 16 recipients of the inaugural Global Education Awards for Internationalizing Curriculum, launched as part of UCLA’s strategic goal to expand its global reach.

The awards support efforts to revise a current UCLA course, design a new course, or design a new program, concentration, or track that incorporates global perspectives.

Kian Goh, associate professor of urban planning, is developing Global Cities and Global Climate Change, an interdisciplinary course that will help students better understand global climate change and its impacts on urban ways of life.

Lené Levy-Storms, associate professor of social welfare, will partner with two Mongolian universities to develop a new elective for the gerontology interdisciplinary minor that uses international perspectives to explore intergenerational relationships throughout the human aging experience.

In its first year, the UCLA Global Advisors Council also awarded 10 Global Research Awards, focused on expanding an existing domestic research project, enhancing one or more international partnerships, or engaging students and other partners in a research initiative that addresses global issues. The 2025 global education and research grants totaled nearly $500,000.

Read the full story

National Shade Map a Stroke of ‘Bruingenuity’

A new national Shade Map spearheaded by experts at the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation and the nonprofit American Forests made UCLA Magazine’s list of the top 25 “Bruinventions” of the 21st Century (so far).

The tool helps cities across the United States respond to extreme heat by mapping an essential climate solution: shade.

“Never before has it been this easy for communities in the U.S. to know how much shade they have, where it is and whether the source is buildings or vegetation,” said V. Kelly Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. The resource gives decision-makers in more than 360 cities and towns the data to guide local heat resilience efforts.

The top 25 Bruinventions, listed in the latest edition of UCLA Magazine, pays tribute to the long history of creativity and innovation by UCLA students, faculty and alumni. This century’s index of Bruingenuity includes scientific discoveries, technological wizardry, medical marvels, and ingenious gadgets.

Read the full story

Global Study Reveals Best Cities for Walking and Cycling

A new global study analyzed walking and cycling patterns in 11,587 cities across 121 countries, revealing that some cities consistently outperform others for active transportation. Dense cities with extensive bike lanes, such as Wageningen in the Netherlands and Copenhagen in Denmark, top the list, while terrain and climate have less impact than previously assumed.

The research also highlights the influence of policy and pricing: higher gas prices and investments in nonmotorized infrastructure significantly increase walking and cycling rates. Cities like Osaka, Japan, and Nairobi, Kenya, showcase how thoughtful urban design can balance pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles.

Lead author and Luskin professor of urban planning Adam Millard-Ball emphasizes that infrastructure drives behavior: “It’s not that Dutch people are genetically predisposed to cycling; it’s that most Dutch cities have really good infrastructure for cycling. If it were quicker and safe to walk or bike to their kids’ school or to the store or to work, then Americans would do that just as much as anyone else.”

Selina Barajas: Championing Community, Culture, and Equity in Tucson’s Ward 5 UCLA Luskin alumna brings her planning expertise and community-first values to Tucson’s City Council as the first woman to represent Ward 5

Selina Barajas (MA UP ’10) has always believed that true change begins at the community level — by listening, collaborating, and caring for the places and people who make a city thrive. This November, that belief carried her to a historic victory as the first woman ever elected to represent Ward 5 on the Tucson City Council. This is the first time in Tucson history that the council majority – four out of the six seats – will be women. 

As a fourth-generation Tucsonan, Barajas’ roots run deep. She grew up immersed in the city’s diverse cultures, attending local schools, exploring the Sonoran Desert, and learning firsthand the importance of community connection. From an early age, she witnessed the power of civic engagement through her family and found her passion for advocacy through a youth mentorship program with Chicanos Por La Causa (CPLC).  

Selina Barajas with one hand on her hip, wearing a cowboy hat smiling at the camera. She is standing in a desert in Arizona.

It was at CPLC that she met former Executive Director Lorraine Lee, who became an early mentor and encouraged Barajas to pursue a master’s degree at UCLA, just as Lee had. 

Those early experiences at CPLC laid the foundation for her next chapter, and by 2008, Barajas was enrolled as a master’s in urban planning student at UCLA. 

Barajas says UCLA inspired her lifelong commitment to equity-centered leadership. “My time at UCLA Luskin shaped my approach by emphasizing that community-driven development and social equity are inseparable,” she said. “I learned to center the voices of those most impacted by policies and planning decisions, and to design solutions that reflect their needs, culture, and expertise.” 

She says the master’s program also taught her how to combine analytical rigor with empathy and opportunities to apply her classroom learning in real-world projects. “Luskin taught me to see equity not as an add-on, but as the foundation for lasting, meaningful change. It also provided real-world opportunities to engage directly with communities, applying what we learned in the classroom.” 

“Luskin taught me to see equity not as an add-on, but as the foundation for lasting, meaningful change.”

Barajas also credits Luskin’s urban planning program with sharpening both her technical and human-centered skills. Courses in data analysis and geographic information systems (GIS) gave her the ability to visualize disparities and advocate for equity through evidence-based planning. She also recalled the lasting influence of the late Professor Leo Estrada, one of the first scholars, she says, to center diversity and representation in urban planning. “He taught us that planning is not just about policy or design — it’s about people,” Barajas recalled. “His guidance helped shape my lifelong commitment to community development and equity.” 

After graduating from UCLA Luskin in 2010, Barajas spent a decade working in nonprofits and local government in and around Los Angeles, strengthening her commitment to youth empowerment and inclusive community development.  

Barajas returned to Tucson in 2018 to continue her work at the intersection of environmental justice, cultural preservation, transportation planning and entrepreneurship. She and her husband are in the process of opening  Luna y Sol Cafe, South Tucson’s first-ever coffee shop and bird and butterfly habitat created in partnership with the Tucson Bird Alliance. Designed as a gathering place for connection, conversation, and stewardship, the cafe reflects her vision for an inclusive and sustainable city. Selina Barajas and two other women stand with signs about protecting the land

Barajas also founded Reinas Who Hike, a Southern Arizona collective that inspires women — especially women of color — to connect with nature, advocate for public lands, and build confidence on the trails. 

“Whether through hiking, small business, or public service, everything I do is about creating spaces of belonging,” Barajas said. “When people feel seen, valued, and connected, they invest in their community — and that’s how real change happens.” 

Barajas secured her Ward 5 seat after winning the Democratic primary earlier this year and ran unopposed in the general election. She will take office on Dec. 2, 2025, succeeding longtime council member Richard Fimbres, who retired after serving more than sixteen years of service. 

As she prepares to take office, Barajas says she’s ready to bring her planning background and community-first approach to the Tucson City Council. Her priorities include advancing environmental justice, supporting small businesses, improving parks and public spaces, and ensuring Ward 5 residents have a real voice in shaping their city. 

For Barajas, her election win represents both a personal milestone and a collective achievement. “Becoming the first woman to represent Ward 5 is deeply meaningful,” she said. “It honors the generations of women and community leaders who paved the way, and it inspires me to keep opening doors for those who come after me — including my daughters.” 

To current UCLA Luskin students and future civic leaders, Barajas offers simple but powerful advice: listen first, show up, and stay rooted in purpose. “Civic leadership is about building trust,” she said. “Start by engaging with your community, volunteering, and learning from others doing the work. Let your passion for your community guide you.” 

Barajas exemplifies the changemakers UCLA Luskin is proud to call our own. “I envision a Tucson that is inclusive and resilient — a city shaped by the ideas, needs, and voices of the community itself,” Barajas said. “That’s the Tucson I’ll work to build every day.”  

A group of women on a hike in Arizona.

Schwarz on Promoting School Greening as Global Temperatures Rise

A recent study led by UCLA associate professor of urban planning Kristen Schwarz highlights the lack of shade on California’s K‑12 school campuses, exposing students to extreme heat during outdoor activities. Analyzing over 7,200 urban public schoolyards from 2018 to 2022, the team found that 85% of schools lost tree canopy, with a median coverage of just 6.4%.

L.A. Times reports that many of these schools lack adequate tree cover and children, whose abilities to regulate body temperature are still developing, are particularly vulnerable when exposed to the intense heat outdoors. This presents a pressing concern as global temperatures continue to rise and give way to dangerous heat waves.

“Extreme heat is becoming a major public health concern in California and across the country, and trees can play a really big role in helping us cool down those schools and also build climate resilience,” said Schwarz.

To better understand the cooling effect of trees, Schwarz and her team are examining the trees and microclimates of schools across several districts in California. They hope their findings will inform policymakers and promote school greening to provide a cooler, safer environment for students in the face of global warming.

Keeping California Children Cool: Strategies for Safe Schools and Homes

By Mara Elana Burstein

As heat waves become more frequent and intense, many California children face unsafe indoor temperatures where they spend most of their time — at home and at school. Access to cooling in homes and schools is now a public health necessity, not a luxury.

Building on years of research on heat resilience and school safety, the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation has released a report offering policymakers a menu of strategies to expand access to cooling in homes and schools. The recommendations focus on the installation and maintenance of air conditioning and other mechanical cooling systems, offering practical, evidence-based options for state leaders seeking to protect children where they live and learn.

Children shouldn’t have to choose between their health and their education. Our research shows that California can take immediate, concrete steps to make schools and homes safer from heat. — Lana Zimmerman, project manager and lead author of the report

The report outlines a set of policy and regulatory actions California leaders can adopt:

  • Set indoor temperature standards for schools and plan similar action during the 2031 Building Standards Code update, or sooner as an emergency health and safety measure.
  • Track cooling access in schools, as the state already does for homes.
  • Coordinate agencies through a state-level advisory committee.
  • Fund existing programs that support equitable access to indoor cooling by serving high-need schools, homes, and regions.
  • Centralize public information and simplify funding processes for local governments and communities.
  • Prioritize equity by investing in high-need regions and supporting workforce training for cooling system installation.

These strategies are informed by new data from the 2025 Luskin California Poll that reveal gaps in access to indoor cooling and public opinion on state action. In the survey, nearly half of parents said they’ve kept their kids home because of heat, and yet one in ten households with children lack working air conditioning (AC). Many more Californians avoid using their AC because of high energy bills.

“Expanding access to cooling is about more than comfort. It’s about health and equity,” said V. Kelly Turner, associate director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. “The solutions outlined in our report recognize that children in low-income households and communities of color are often the most exposed to heat and have the least resources to respond,” added Turner, who is also an associate professor of urban planning at UCLA Luskin.

As California implements new investments in school modernization, clean energy, and community resilience, this research offers a timely guide for aligning those efforts. The report, “Keeping Californians Safe with Cooling Systems in Homes and Schools,” underscores that keeping classrooms cool and homes safe is essential to a healthy, equitable future for the state’s children.

Tilly on the Government Shutdown and Specter of Recession

UCLA Luskin’s Chris Tilly spoke to Al Jazeera News about the consequences of the U.S. government’s extended shutdown.

About 1.4 million federal employees are furloughed or working without pay, and many government services have been suspended nationwide. Tilly spoke about the multiplier effects that could shake consumer and business confidence in the economy. And he noted that the shutdown is one crisis point in a bigger fight about the role of government, including recent moves to keep taxes low on billionaires and cut back on the social safety net.

“We economists feel like there’s a lot of reasons to be concerned because the economy is already fragile,” said Tilly, a labor economist and professor of urban planning and sociology. “The Federal Reserve and economic forecasters are saying we’re scarily close to falling into a recession. So it may not take much to push us over the edge.”